Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (30)
Entities connected to both Martindell and the Federal Criminal Code
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON52 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON51 w/ Martindell·3 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON40 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
SW
Sweet
PERSON27 w/ Martindell·3 w/ the
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON16 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON15 w/ Martindell·3 w/ the
Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
BH
Branzburg v. Hayes
PERSON11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON11 w/ Martindell·3 w/ the
International Tel
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Woody Allen
PERSON9 w/ Martindell·3 w/ the
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Martindell·3 w/ the
Orange
LOCATION6 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Meserve, Mumper & Hughes
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
TeL Corp.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
the Protective Order
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the
Fourt
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Martindell·4 w/ the