Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions
Page EFTA00011454
2 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 v. Maxwell, 325 F
Page: EFTA00011454 →Page EFTA00011469
a civil case from disclosing confidential documents to others. 154 F.R.D. at 92-93. Despite this prohibition, counsel for the defendant approached the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and suggested that it had evidence of criminal violations relating to the case. Id. at 93. A grand jury issued a subpoena, and the defendant produc
Page: EFTA00011469 →2 mentions
Page EFTA00029079
2 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 v. Maxwell, 325 F
Page: EFTA00029079 →Page EFTA00029094
a civil case from disclosing confidential documents to others. 154 F.R.D. at 92-93. Despite this prohibition, counsel for the defendant approached the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and suggested that it had evidence of criminal violations relating to the case. Id. at 93. A grand jury issued a subpoena, and the defendant produc
Page: EFTA00029094 →2 mentions
Page EFTA00029818
2 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 v. Maxwell, 325 F
Page: EFTA00029818 →Page EFTA00029833
a civil case from disclosing confidential documents to others. 154 F.R.D. at 92-93. Despite this prohibition, counsel for the defendant approached the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and suggested that it had evidence of criminal violations relating to the case. Id. at 93. A grand jury issued a subpoena, and the defendant produc
Page: EFTA00029833 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (45)
Entities connected to both Affiliated FM Ins. and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON6 w/ Affiliated·6 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON6 w/ Affiliated·5 w/ the
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Affiliated·4 w/ the
U.S. Attorney's Office
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Affiliated·5 w/ the
Schiller
PERSON6 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·4 w/ the
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON6 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·4 w/ the
Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
Cohen & Gresser LLP
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
MA
Martindell
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
PA
Paredes
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
Martha Stewart
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
LM
Laura Menninger
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
District Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Affiliated·4 w/ the
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the
BS
Bobbi C. Sternheim
PERSON5 w/ Affiliated·3 w/ the