Epstein Secrets

rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice

Ellis LLP Alston & Bird LIP May 19, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (202) 514.0467 CONFIDENTIAL honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice Dear Judge Filip: In his confirmation hearings last fall, Judge Mukasey admirably lifted up the finest traditions of the Department of Justice an

prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys) Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice

(213)680'8400 www.kirkland.com June 19,2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: Facsimile: (213) 6804500 Dir. Fax: (213) 6804500 I again want t

ll prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice

O. rADEARY e. MoVEY CS COUNSEL DOWSE MOIJCH June 19, 2008 Mr. Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice Dear Mr. Roth: TELEPHONE FACSRA.MIMI WRITER'S DIRECT ORR 1 write to offer my reaction to the May 15, 2008 correspondence from the United States