Epstein Secrets

ash the subpoena shows "exceptional circumstances that clearly favor subordinating the subpoena to the protective order." hi re Grand Jury Subpoena (Roach), 138 F.3d 442, 445 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 939 (1998); hi re: Grand Jury, 286 F.3d 153, 157-158 (3d Cir. 2002). The Government is aware

had at least called the witness before the grand jury). The subject matter of the Litigation also demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances of the Government's Investigation and Application, insofar as the materials at issue here appear not to be of the sort that ordinarily would provide protection against Government investigation. See

ash the subpoena shows "exceptional circumstances that clearly favor subordinating the subpoena to the protective order." In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Roach), 138 F.3d 442, 445 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 939 (1998); In re: Grand Jury, 286 F.3d 153, 157-158 (3d Cir. 2002). The Government is aware

had at least called the witness before the grand jury). The subject matter of the Litigation also demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances of the Government's Investigation and Application, insofar as the materials at issue here appear not to be of the sort that ordinarily would provide protection against Government investigation. See

ash the subpoena shows "exceptional circumstances that clearly favor subordinating the subpoena to the protective order." In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Roach), 138 F.3d 442, 445 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 939 (1998); In re: Grand Jury, 286 F.3d 153, 157-158 (3d Cir. 2002). The Government is aware

had at least called the witness before the grand jury). The subject matter of the Litigation also demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances of the Government's Investigation and Application, insofar as the materials at issue here appear not to be of the sort that ordinarily would provide protection against Government investigation. See

ash the subpoena shows "exceptional circumstances that clearly favor subordinating the subpoena to the protective order." In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Roach), 138 F.3d 442, 445 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 939 (1998); In re: Grand Jury, 286 F.3d 153, 157-158 (3d Cir. 2002). The Government is aware

had at least called the witness before the grand jury). The subject matter of the Litigation also demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances of the Government's Investigation and Application, insofar as the materials at issue here appear not to be of the sort that ordinarily would provide protection against Government investigation. See