Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
The Supreme Court has explained that a party seeking disclosure of grand jury materials must make a showing of a "particularized need." Id. (citing Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 222 (1979)). Petitioners cannot make such a showing. Moreover, the documents they seek to make available
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
The Supreme Court has explained that a party seeking disclosure of grand jury materials must make a showing of a "particularized need." Id. (citing Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 222 (1979)). Petitioners cannot make such a showing. Moreover, the documents they seek to make available
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
The Supreme Court has explained that a party seeking disclosure of grand jury materials must make a showing of a "particularized need." Id. (citing Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 222 (1979)). Petitioners cannot make such a showing. Moreover, the documents they seek to make available
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Douglas Oil Co. and v. Lir Joe Records
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON45 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Michael Douglas
PERSON45 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION40 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON37 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
George W. Bush
PERSON35 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON34 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
the Southern District
LOCATION29 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON28 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
JE
James Eisenberg
PERSON21 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON17 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON16 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
West Palm Beach
LOCATION16 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON15 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Paul Cassell
PERSON13 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Kenna
PERSON12 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Jacksonville
LOCATION12 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
Moussaoui
PERSON10 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON10 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.
CH
Chambers
PERSON11 w/ Douglas·2 w/ v.
RU
Rubin
PERSON9 w/ Douglas·3 w/ v.