Epstein Secrets

einger, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Cri

ocket 04)07:2011 Page 10 of 10 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale,

obtain disclosure and use of grand jury materials covered by the secrecy provisions of Rule 6(e), the petitioner must show a "particularized need." Douglas Oil Co. I Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 223 (1979). The Douglas Oil Court explained that in order to pierce the veil of Rule 6(e) secrecy, [p]arti

requested."). CONCURRENCE REGARDING THE FILING OF THIS MOTION 26. The filing of this application has been approved by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and the Chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. 27. The Criminal Chief also

pt the invitation and made no submission. The court then entered an order granting the motions to quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 99 S.Ct. 1667, 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979), the court found that the government had failed to establish a suffi

EFTA00186707 U.S. Departme A- Justice U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Grand Jury Coordinator State Attorney's Office 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida West Palm Beach, Florida Re: Federal Grand Jury Subp

the invitation and made no submission. The court then entered an order granting the motions to . quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 99 S.Ct. 1667, 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979), the court found that the government had failed to establish a suffi

to pay such costs (28 USC 1825, Rule 17(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)" EFTA00186750 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Denise Coffman, Esq. Counsel to the Clerk of Cou

the destruction of or tampering with evidence, or otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation, the materials should not be unsealed. See, e.g., Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 n.9 (1979) ("Since the 17th century, grand jury proceedings have been closed to the public; and record

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Moto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 22, 2020 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL The H

er the Fourth and Fifth Amendments (Motion II) are narrowly tailored to protect the integrity of the Government's ongoing investigation. See, e.g., Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 n.9 (1979) ("Since the 17th century, grand jury proceedings have been closed to the public; and record

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 January 28, 2021 BY ECF & ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honora

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

AL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331619 EFTA_00204345 EFTA02729331 opposed disclosure (A-2). On August 16, 2008, Judge Marra of the Southern District ordered the United States Attorney's Office to produce the non-prosecution agreement to the Does' attorneys and to any other victims and their coun

he invitation and made no submission. The court then entered an order granting the motions to co. quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Nonhwest, 441 U.S. 211, 99 S.Ct. 1667. 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979), the court found that the government had failed to establish a suffic

5g: al 9l49 5/ if 3,w/a EFTA00277550 UU/U0, ,CUU0 ZU:41 rAA 001OULII01 UbAU Orb ty trJUUZ U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida September 6, 2006 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Denise Coffman, Esq. Counsel to the Clerk of Court and Comptroller 15th Judicial Circuit of F

pt the invitation and made no submission. The court then entered an order granting the motions to quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 99 S.Ct. 1667, 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979), the court found that the government had failed to establish a suffi

aterial) Descri don: r 9 EFTA01699656 09/06/2006 20:41 FAX 5618021787 USA° WPB FL i3002 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE est alm Beac F on. a Re: Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Dear 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beac