5
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
t in camera request - especially when there is a question as to whether those documents were obtained by uulawful means); St. Andrews Park, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Army Corps of Engineers, 299 F.Supp.2d 1264 (S.D. Fla. 2003)(court determined that an in camera proceeding was appropriate when it involved a sma
efender's office, Dave Brannon, Esq .. At or around that same time, Counsel for Jane Does 2-8 provided a copy of the book or journal to counsel for Jane Doe, Mr. Bradley Edwards. Upon learning of Jane Does 2-8's counsel and Jane Doe's counsel coming into possession of the journal or book in the face of
Microsoft Word - 2016-02-08 Response to Defendant's Alan Dershowitz's Moton for Clarification of Confidentiality Order or Rel
search, no records were found. See Cunningham v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 961 F.Supp. 2d 226, 236 (D.C. 2013) (
J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs. Vv, ALAN DERSHOWITZ. Defendant, - ORDER ON BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP AND JANE DOE NO, 3’s MOTIONS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER This Cause comes belore the Court on November 2, 2015 upon Boies, Schiller & Flexner L1P’
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015657 →based on the filing of a "motion asserting a victim's rights" - not a civil complaint or a civil lawsuit. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3); see Sieverding v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93,110 (D.D.C. 2010) (recognizing that it is "only through a motion" that the CVRA "permits" individuals to assert stat
Page: EFTA00010553 →U.S. Attorney's Office properly conferred in a timely fashion back in 2007"); id. at 24-25 ("If the Government had properly conferred with the two Jane Does ... [t]hese events would have provided Jane Doe 1 and 2 with much more information about Epstein's criminal conspiracy and its scope and operation,
Page: EFTA00010566 →ex M, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 11 U.S. Dept. of Justice, JUSTICE MANUAL, JM § 9-11.151 15 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 19 N.Y. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3(d) 24 N.Y. Rules of P
Page: EFTA00028932 →g the government's ex parte request to modify the Jane Doe 43 Protective Order in part because the governme
Page: EFTA00028955 →Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 11 U.S. Dept. of Justice, JUSTICE MANUAL, JM § 9-11.151 15 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 19 M. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3(d) 24 MI. Rules of Profe
Page: EFTA00029103 →g the government's ex parte request to modify the Jane Doe 43 Protective Order in part because the governme
Page: EFTA00029126 →Entities connected to both U.S. Dept. and Jane Doe

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Donald Trump
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
David Boies
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Colorado
LOCATIONSigrid McCawley
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATIONGarcia
PERSONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONU.S. Attorney's Office
ORGANIZATIONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATION