Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both USAO-SDFL and v. Lir Joe Records
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON37 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION31 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
the Southern District
LOCATION26 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON23 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON20 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Paul Cassell
PERSON17 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON16 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
SA
Santobello
PERSON15 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON15 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Marc Rich
PERSON14 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Jacksonville
LOCATION12 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Phoenix
LOCATION12 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
McDonald's Corp.
ORGANIZATION11 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
New York
LOCATION11 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION11 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION12 w/ USAO-SDFL·2 w/ v.
GA
Garcia
PERSON10 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.
WA
Walker
PERSON10 w/ USAO-SDFL·3 w/ v.