17
Total Mentions
17
Documents
328
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
McDonald's Corp. is mentioned in four documents within the Epstein files. These mentions appear to be incidental, primarily in legal contexts or as part of lists of corporations.
McDonald's Corp. appears in legal documents referencing court cases. It's also listed alongside other major corporations in documents that may be related to lists of contacts or organizations. These mentions suggest a weak or incidental connection to the Epstein files. There is no evidence in the provided documents to suggest any direct or substantive involvement of McDonald's with Jeffrey Epstein.
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (Ilth Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Assn v. Norton
Page: EFTA00010477 →Jaguar Land Rover Ltd. Johnson & Johnson Knights of Columbus USA Inc. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Los Angeles Rams Major Lindsey & Africa LLC McDonald's Corp. McKesson Corp. Microsoft Corp. Moderna Inc. Morgan Stanley National Collegiate Athletic Association National Employment Law Project National
Page: EFTA00011406 →exisNexis Group Madison Square Garden Entertainment Group LLC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corp. Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Match Group Inc. McDonald's Corp. Microsoft Corp. Miramax Film Corp. Pfizer Inc. Power Solutions International Inc. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP State Bar of California Steelcase
Page: EFTA00019089 →ade dispute between the two nations. Read full article Los Angeles Times Louisiana State Bar Association Massachusetts Institute of Technology McDonald's Corp. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission Michigan State University Microsoft Corp. Mississippi Center for Justice NBCUniversal Media LLC National
Page: EFTA00030769 →EFTA00074599
rst, they provide notice to the enjoined party of precisely what it must do to avoid being held in contempt—the party cannot be left guessing. See McDonald's Corp. v. Robertson, 147 F.3d 1301, 1311 (11th Cir. 1998). Second, a specific and reasonably detailed order is easy to enforce, while a vague order is no
EFTA00076068
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto
EFTA00095871
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto
EFTA00100337
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (Ilth Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Assn v. Norton
EFTA00205154
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;'); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional . . . ."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. No
EFTA00208794
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto
EFTA00209769
sents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc.'. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'it I. Nort
EFTA00795150
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto
EFTA00799474
ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto
EFTA00799494_sub_001 - EFTA00799494_100
2000); Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. South Florida Water Management Dist., 647 F.3d 1296, 1302 (11th Cir. 2011); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007); Scott v. Taylor, 470 F.3d 1014, 1018 (11th Cir. 2006); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norton, 324 F.3d
EFTA00208822_sub_001 - EFTA00208822_100
2000); Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. South Florida Water Management Dist., 647 F.3d 1296, 1302 (11th Cir. 2011); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007); Scott v. Taylor, 470 F.3d 1014, 1018 (11th Cir. 2006); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norton, 324 F.3d
EFTA00081015_sub_001 - EFTA00081015_100
2000); Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. South Florida Water Management Dist., 647 F.3d 1296, 1302 (11th Cir. 2011); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007); Scott v. Taylor, 470 F.3d 1014, 1018 (11th Cir. 2006); National Parks Conservation Ass 'n v. Norton, 324 F.3d
EFTA00795170_sub_001 - EFTA00795170_100
2000); Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. South Florida Water Management Dist., 647 F.3d 1296, 1302 (11th Cir. 2011); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007); Scott v. Taylor, 470 F.3d 1014, 1018 (11th Cir. 2006); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norton, 324 F.3d

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City

Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
Santobello
PersonLegal case citation (Santobello v. New York) in Epstein court documents

Jacksonville
LocationCity in Duval County, and largest city in State of Florida, United States
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents
Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc.
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

Phoenix
LocationSeat of Maricopa County, largest city in, and capital of, the State of Arizona, United States
USAO-SDFL
OrganizationGovernment agency

Bradley Edwards
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Epstein victims, author of Relentless Pursuit

Harvey Weinstein
PersonAmerican film producer and sex offender (born 1952)
Friends of the Earth, Inc.
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents
Broward, Inc.
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

Paul Cassell
PersonUnited States federal judge
Scott v. Taylor
PersonPerson referenced in documents

A. Marie Villafana
PersonFormer Assistant U.S. Attorney, lead federal prosecutor in the 2008 Epstein case

South Florida
LocationRegion of the U.S. state of Florida