Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
f the Non-Prosecution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"). See, e.g., DE 99 at 6 (recognizing that the relief Petitioners seek "is to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement"). But even assuming arguendo
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
f the Non-Prosecution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"). See, e.g., DE 99 at 6 (recognizing that the relief Petitioners seek "is to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement"). But even assuming arguendo
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
f the Non-Prosecution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"). See, e.g., DE 99 at 6 (recognizing that the relief Petitioners seek "is to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement"). But even assuming arguendo
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
f the Non-Prosecution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"). See, e.g., DE 99 at 6 (recognizing that the relief Petitioners seek "is to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement"). But even assuming arguendo
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
f the Non-Prosecution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"). See, e.g., DE 99 at 6 (recognizing that the relief Petitioners seek "is to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement"). But even assuming arguendo
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mber 24, 2007, after a year-long investigation, the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"), entered into the NPA with Mr. Epstein. The NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from five distinct potential federal charges that "may have been committed
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mber 24, 2007, after a year-long investigation, the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"), entered into the NPA with Mr. Epstein. The NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from five distinct potential federal charges that "may have been committed
is designed to prevent federal courts from engaging in such speculation and prematurely and perhaps unnecessarily reaching constitutional issues." Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1280. In these proceedings, the Petitioners have sought to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the USAO-SDFL s
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (185)
Entities connected to both USAO-SDFL and Yogananda Pittman
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON37 w/ USAO-SDFL·17 w/ Yogananda
United States
LOCATION31 w/ USAO-SDFL·19 w/ Yogananda
the Southern District
LOCATION26 w/ USAO-SDFL·10 w/ Yogananda
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON23 w/ USAO-SDFL·11 w/ Yogananda
Kenneth Marra
PERSON20 w/ USAO-SDFL·14 w/ Yogananda
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON15 w/ USAO-SDFL·14 w/ Yogananda
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ USAO-SDFL·12 w/ Yogananda
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION20 w/ USAO-SDFL·8 w/ Yogananda
Bradley Edwards
PERSON16 w/ USAO-SDFL·11 w/ Yogananda
Alexander Acosta
PERSON15 w/ USAO-SDFL·12 w/ Yogananda
FBI
ORGANIZATION17 w/ USAO-SDFL·9 w/ Yogananda
Paul Cassell
PERSON17 w/ USAO-SDFL·9 w/ Yogananda
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION17 w/ USAO-SDFL·9 w/ Yogananda
Atlanta
LOCATION9 w/ USAO-SDFL·16 w/ Yogananda
SA
Santobello
PERSON15 w/ USAO-SDFL·9 w/ Yogananda
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON12 w/ USAO-SDFL·11 w/ Yogananda
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON13 w/ USAO-SDFL·9 w/ Yogananda
Marc Rich
PERSON14 w/ USAO-SDFL·8 w/ Yogananda
Samantha Power
PERSON10 w/ USAO-SDFL·11 w/ Yogananda
Jacksonville
LOCATION12 w/ USAO-SDFL·9 w/ Yogananda