Epstein Secrets

hibit_B.pdf (USANYS)" Thanks, I'd been planning to redact the exhibits, but the attached one is somewhat complicated to redact. Do we think Judge Nathan would let us just file it under seal? If we do, we can docket the whole motion and just submit this one exhibit under seal. From Sent: Monda Novem

From To: Cc: Subject: RE: Daubert motion Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 03:37:45 +0000 Attachments: Exhibit_B.pdf (USANYS)" Thanks, I'd been planning to redact the exhibits, but the atta

412 Motion have been notified of the November 10 hearing and of their right to attend. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 8, 2021 New York, New York 1 ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge EFTA00027649

ndant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378, the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386, and the other outstanding issues that overlap with these two motions as di

ease find an opinion and order issued by Judge Nathan. It will be docketed tomorrow morning after today's holiday. Sincerely, Chambers of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan EFTA00094641

Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York. NY 10007 On Nov 11, 2021, at 5:17 PM, a alMIN> wrote: Daubert opinion on Rocchio, in case it's of interest. Thanks again! From: Nathan NYSD Chambers ‹ > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 5:10 PM To: Jeff Pagl

Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/22/21 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Defense on November 1, 2021, noticed eight expert witnesses. Def. Br., Ex. I ("Notice"). Two of those experts, Dr. Park Dietz

od's operation, and whether the method is accepted by the expert community. United States v. Kidd, 385 F. Supp. 3d 259, 263 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Phanns., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593-94 (1993)). But Rule 702 ultimately sets a "liberal" and "permissive" standard of admissibility. N

5 (2d Cir. 2017). To determine whether an expert's method is reliable, the Court considers the non-exhaustive list provided by the Supreme Court in Daubert, including whether the expert's method has been tested, whether it has been subjected to peer review, the rate of error, standards controlling the m