Epstein Secrets

nce with §§ 16.24 and 16.25 of this part." Id. § 16.22(a). For matters concerning our Office, the proper official is the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Id. § 16.22(b). To facilitate the process of determining whether such approval will be given, a party seeking such information must pro

ar, Steven (USANYS) 4 Cc: (USANYS) ) (USANYS) dc ); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests 1 take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

nce with §§ 16.24 and 16.25 of this part." Id. § 16.22(a). For matters concerning our Office, the proper official is the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Id. § 16.22(b). To facilitate the process of determining whether such approval will be given, a party seeking such information must pro

evar, Steven (USANYS) (USANYS) •ca; Cc: (USANYS) > Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

Epstein and his assistants, we man prove that Epstein and the assistants intended that Epitein engage in this sexual activity before he traveled to the Southern District of Florida or returned to New York, certain charges, that he knew or reasonably should have known that the girls were under 18. , who was both a vi

one number during the relevant period). Thus, the likelihood of succeeding on sue a prosecution is very small. Furthermore, a decision to prosecute Lacerda could result in a refusal by many more girls to come forward because the majority of the identified girls brought other girls to Epstein, so all of