Epstein Secrets

nformation about a personal or business relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and either the U.S. Attorney or any Assistant U.S. Attorney serving in the Southern District of Florida. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 19. 20. Admitted. 21. Denied. 9 EFTA00191207 22. (a) Admitte

s Nos. P-008891 thru P-009103; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009114 thru P-009115; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009712 thru P-009819; A copy of the Privilege Log that was filed with the Court; and A copy of the Responses to your Requests for Admissions that were filed with the Court. Please let me know if y

n, which she is likely to refuse to give or provide, on the matters about which she may be interrogated before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, including a Grand Jury impaneled therein, as well as subsequent proceedings or trial, and respectfully alleges as follows: 1. That ==.

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Ord

orida, and the Defendant will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, prosecution in this District for these offenses shall be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided that Epstein

s Nos. P-008891 thru P-009103; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009114 that P-009115; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009712 thru P-009819; A copy of the Privilege Log that was filed with the Court; and A copy of the Responses to your Requests for Admissions that were filed with the Court. Please let me know if y

lm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: February 5, 2007 This letter confirms the understanding between yourself and the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida. You have represented that you will truthfully answer questions of the federal government in its investigation of the procurement of pro

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parse in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Or

ice accordingly entered into a NPA reflecting such agreement. Most significantly, the NPA gave Epstein a promise that he would not be prosecuted in the Southern District of Florida for a series of federal felony offenses involving his sexual abuse of more than 30 known minor girls and countless other unknown minors.

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Or

) and may be viewed as a waiver of the privilege or protection." 799 So. 2d at 340. The TIG court further observed that Local Rule 26.1(G)(3)(b), of the Southern District of Florida, spelled out the requirements for a valid privilege log, hi. at 341: Where a claim of privilege is asserted in objecting to any interro

rior to that time, although Epstein does not hereby waive the right to an in camera review with respect to any of the other materials referenced in the Privilege Log. Finally, the actual prejudice to and impact on Epstein by Edwards' willful and continued non-compliance is palpable. Epstein has been prejudiced