Epstein Secrets

ed or not removed from the )f office, like a security force, Broward County PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. EFTA00599684 Page 24 1 Police, U.S. Marshals. A. From my recollection there were at some point 3 in time, there were people in the office monitoring 4 activity in the office. 5 Q. Was t

9 A. I didn't tell you that. 10 Q. Okay. Let me ask you then: Did you ever 11 use Qtask, you personally create a project as it 12 related to Jane Doe's case against Mr. Epstein? A. No. 14 Q. To your knowledge did you direct anyone 15 well, let me strike that. Did you direct anyone to 16 crea

A00599740 Page 80 A. I'm finished. 2 Q. Which case was he the referring lawyer, Mr. Howell? 4 A. Q. And he may be the referring lawyer on Jane 6 Doe, and ., you just don't know as you sit here, 7 or he is? 8 A. He referred .'s case. 9 Q. And the other two cases is he is shown as 10 the

d that: DOJ was required to meet with her and investigate (if not prosecute) her various allegations of criminal behavior [by FBI agents and Deputy U.S. Marshals in connection with the court-ordered arrests]. She argues that the Justice for All Act of 200415 "gives her the right to discuss her allegation of

FLSD Docket 04:07)2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH

d that: DOJ was required to meet with her and investigate (if not prosecute) her various allegations of criminal behavior [by FBI agents and Deputy U.S. Marshals in connection with the court-ordered arrests]. She argues that the Justice for All Act of 2004 "gives her the right to discuss her allegation of c

fforts to comply with the CVRA. (DE 6-8, 12-14.) On July 10, 2008, the Court set the matter for a hearing on July 11, 2008. (DE 5.) At the hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added as a Petitioner. (DE15 at 14.) The Court inquired of Petitioners what remedy they sought, and Petitioners made clear that they wanted t

d-a-half months of his tenure. The article added that during that initial period — Nov. 18, 2022, through March 31, 2023 — nearly $2 million went to U.S. Marshals protection. The New York Post (01/05, Nava), The Daily Beast (01/05, Alfred), The Hill (01/05, Bertsch), Raw Story (01/OS, Culliton), The Epoch Tim

as HB in court documents sued Classica Cruise Operator Ltd for the May 2023 incident. The article mentioned that her cabinmate, identified only as "Jane Doe" or "SE" in court documents, brought additional allegations against him in her complaint filed in West Palm Beach, Florida. The article added that D

d that: DOJ was required to meet with her and investigate (if not prosecute) her various allegations of criminal behavior [by FBI agents and Deputy U.S. Marshals in connection with the court-ordered arrests]. She argues that the Justice for All Act of 200415 "gives her the right to discuss her allegation of

FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH

d that: DOJ was required to meet with her and investigate (if not prosecute) her various allegations of criminal behavior [by FBI agents and Deputy U.S. Marshals in connection with the court-ordered arrests] She argues that the Justice for All Act of 200413 "gives her the right to discuss her allegation of c

AM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 4 of 42 Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually abused were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, touching of their sexual orga

d that: DOJ was required to meet with her and investigate (if not prosecute) her various allegations of criminal behavior [by FBI agents and Deputy U.S. Marshals in connection with the court-ordered arrests]. She argues that the Justice for All Act of 200415 "gives her the right to discuss her allegation of

KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 2 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ- JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes

d that: DOJ was required to meet with her and investigate (if not prosecute) her various allegations of criminal behavior [by FBI agents and Deputy U.S. Marshals in connection with the court-ordered arrests]. She argues that the Justice for All Act of 200415 "gives her the right to discuss her allegation of

FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE NI AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH