Epstein Secrets

tate Attorney's Office in light of the pre-existing state investigation. In addition to the authorities cited above, the Supreme Court's decision in Heckler v. Chaney , 470 U.S. 821 (1985), further supports the interpretation that the CVRA does not provide for judicial intervention in a case where no cr

A00208518 of a criminal investigation "does not constitute a `case' within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment's Self- Incrimination Clause) (citing Blyew and Black's Law Dictionary). Finally, Congress's use of the definite article "the" in reference to the word "case" supports respondent's view that

e United States in their control over criminal prosecutions. Id. (quoting United States v. Cox. 342 F.2d 167, 171 (5th Cir. 1965)); accord. e.g.. Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821. 832, 105 S.Ct. 1649, 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985) ("gyre decision of a prosecutor in the Executive Branch not to indict ... has l

Ct. 1994, 155 L.Ed.2d 984 (2003). Notably, in so holding, the Court drew on longstanding tradition, citing its now nearly 150-year-old decision in Blyew a United States for the proposition that the word "case" is synonymous with the word "cause" and "rnean[s] a proceeding in court, a suit, or action

ate Attorney's Office in light of the pre- existing state investigation. In addition to the authorities cited above, the Supreme Court's decision in Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985), further supports the interpretation that the CVRA does not provide for judicial intervention in a case where no cri

TA00230075 :••,7"• ,:f.,""•••••• Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 11 of 54 Incrimination Clause) (citing Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 581, 595 (1871), and Black's Law Dictionary). Finally, Congress's use of the definite article "the" in referen