Epstein Secrets

14/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Rolando Garcia, Karen Atkinson, Frederica Devlin, and Shawn Ball regarding complete indictment package for Robert Senior final review Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) P-014717 thru P-014721 3/12/2008-3/17/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Nesbitt Kuyrk

rivilege Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014521 thru P-014522 1/7/2008 email from Marie Villafafia to Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garcia regarding proposed additional investigative steps in Epstein case. Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Pr

the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 2 EFTA00211411 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 18 JANE DOE v. UNITED STAT

14/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Rolando Garcia, Karen Atkinson, Frederica Devlin, and Shawn Ball regarding complete indictment package for Robert Senior final review Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) P-014717 thru P-014721 3/12/2008-3/17/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Nesbitt Kuyrk

rivilege Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014521 thru P-014522 1/7/2008 email from Marie Villafafia to Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garcia regarding proposed additional investigative steps in Epstein case. Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Pr

the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 2 SDNY_GM_02742819 EFTA_00229468 EFTA01325032 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page

14/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Rolando Garcia, Karen Atkinson, Frederica Devlin, and Shawn Ball regarding complete indictment package for Robert Senior final review Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) P-014717 thru P-014721 3/12/2008-3/17/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Nesbitt Kuyrk

rivilege Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014521 thru P-014522 1/7/2008 email from Marie Villafafia to Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garcia regarding proposed additional investigative steps in Epstein case. Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Pr

the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 2 SDNY_GM_02742859 EFTA_00229508 EFTA01325052 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page

on 100 3/14/2008 emails between AMCV, Rolando Garcia, Karen Atkinson, Frederica Devlin, and Shawn Ball regarding complete indictment package for Robert Senior final review WP DP 6(e) 101 3/12/2008 emails between AMCV, Drew Oosterbaan, and Myesha Braden regarding CEOS meeting with Epstein counsel WP

e informed the USAO and the FBI that she was not a victim of any offense committed by Epstein, and, as a result, the USAO did not consider informing Jane Doe #2 about the non-prosecution agreement. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 2(e). 3. Denied. 4. Denied. 5. The

Memorandum Subjai Third Supplement to Prosecution Memorandum: Operation Leap Year: United States'. Jeffrey Epstein. et al. Dale 2/19/08 To: Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Rolando Garcia, Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Region From: cc: A. Marie Villafafia

8's eighteenth birthday, and when Jane Doe #19 was seventeen years old. [NB: The police report describes a pattern of activity, including dates when Jane Doe #18 was seventeen years old.] Neither Jane Doe #18 nor #19 ever returned to Epstein's home. Although we have not yet obtained Jane Doe #18's teleph

of any issue not resolved by the parties through further discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY BLACK, ESQ. /wg CC: By Robert Senior, Esq. Black. Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf. P.A. EFTA00180301 March 20, 2011 To whom it may concern: I served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern D

Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLI

ved by the parties through further discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SLACK, ESQ. By /wg cc: Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Robert Senior, Esq. Black, Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00193777 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NtIRA JACIU

THSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for dirnages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant James Swain, Executive Assistant Alicia O. Valle, Special Counsel Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Kenneth Noto, Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Anne Schultz, Chief, Appellate Division Gerardo Simms, Chief, Asset Forfei

sought to gain access to economically disadvantaged younger girls in his home for paid massages. The 16-year-old girl, identified in the lawsuit as "Jane Doe No. 2," has suffered traumatic injuries, according to the complaint. When the first lawsuit was filed Epstein's attorneys said Epstein never had se

fter reviewing Starr’s and Lefkowitz’s letters, Sloman notified Villafaña that “in light of the recent Kirkland & Ellis correspondence” he had asked Robert Senior, who had succeeded Menchel as Chief of the USAO’s Criminal Division, to review de novo the evidence underlying the proposed revised indictment, and

victim denied being involved in, or being a victim of, criminal activity. Later, the victim obtained new counsel and joined the CVRA litigation as “Jane Doe #2.” 219 In his March 20, 2011 letter, addressed “To whom it may concern,” and published online in The Daily Beast, Acosta described “a year-lo

m trash pulls, the flight manifests from Epstein's private lanes, and testimony from the girls about how the appointments were made. So, if called Jane Doe ake an appointment on January 1st; Epstein traveled to Florida on January 2nd; and Weaned Jane Doe #12 on 18 EFTA02857620 January 3rd (when they wer

JD#2 was 14 when she was brought to JE's home in 2001. JD#1 told JD#2 that she could make $300 for giving a massage to a man in Palm Beach. JD#1 2 Jane Doc #1 was brought to JE's home by Ghislaine Maxwell after Maxwell met her at Mar a Lago. Jane Doe #1 was 15 at the time of her first contact with JE an

dum Subject Third Supplement to Prosecution Memorandum: Operation Lciap Year: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. et al. Date 2/19/08 To: From: Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Deputy Chief, Criminal Division , Chief, Northern Region cc: INTRODUCTION This third supplement summarizes the changes