Epstein Secrets

ctims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed plea in advance or to participate in plea negotiations." In re Dean on remand as United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009). Instead, "[t]he purpose of the reasonable right to confer is for victims to provide information to the

04/17/2012 Page 11 of 23 of disclosure may impede the development of the confidential relationship necessary for successful treatment." Id. at 10. Following Jaffee, three important sets of decisions have recognized privileges under Rule 501 to protect information that is exchanged in an environment that encoura

ictims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed plea in advance or to participate in plea negotiations." In re Dean on remand as United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (M. Tex. 2009). Instead, "Mlle purpose of the reasonable right to confer is for victims to provide information to the gov

hat "the mere possibility of disclosure may impede the development of the confidential relationship necessary for successful treatment." Id. at 10. Following Jaffee, three important sets of decisions have recognized privileges under Rule 501 to protect information that is exchanged in an environment that encoura

ictims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed plea in advance or to participate in plea negotiations." In re Dean on remand as United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (M. Tex. 2009). Instead, "[t]he purpose of the reasonable right to confer is for victims to provide information to the go

hat "the mere possibility of disclosure may impede the development of the confidential relationship necessary for successful treatment." Id. at 10. Following Jaffee, three important sets of decisions have recognized privileges under Rule 501 to protect information that is exchanged in an environment that encoura