Epstein Secrets

Colchico, Consor and Associates, 561-682-0905 (ir) (Entered: 08/12/2011) 08/19/2011 90 NOTICE by United States of America o artment of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel Opinion (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)( (Entered: 08/19/2011) 08/22/2011 91 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Briefing b

3/2013. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/6/2013. (kb) (Entered: 09/06/2013) 235 Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 11(c), the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal re: 195 Notice of Appeal, 194 Notice of Appeal, 196 Notice of Appeal,

TMENT’S INTERPRETATION OF THE CVRA’S DEFINITION OF “CRIME VICTIM” AT THE TIME OF THE EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION ................ 192 A. April 1, 2005 Office of Legal Counsel “Preliminary Review” ............................192 B. 2005 Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance ..............193 IV.

s’ recovery of monetary damages from Epstein. In exchange, the USAO agreed to end its investigation of Epstein and to forgo federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida of him, four named co-conspirators, and “any potential co-conspirators.” Victims were not informed of, or consulted about, a potential s

ice. III. THE DEPARTMENT’S INTERPRETATION OF THE CVRA’S DEFINITION OF “CRIME VICTIM” AT THE TIME OF THE EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION A. April 1, 2005 Office of Legal Counsel “Preliminary Review” In 2005, Department management requested informal guidance from the Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) regarding int

ence, which requires judicial approval. Acosta rejected this idea, however, apparently because of a perception that the federal district courts in the Southern District of Florida did not view Rule 11(c) pleas favorably and might refuse to accept such a plea and thus limit the USAO’s options. Another alternative