Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys) Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
ll prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (94)
Entities connected to both the Office of Professional Responsibility and Office of Enforcement Operations
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON34 w/ the·7 w/ Office
the Southern District
LOCATION26 w/ the·7 w/ Office
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON20 w/ the·7 w/ Office
LB
Leon Black
PERSON19 w/ the·7 w/ Office
RB
Roy Black
PERSON19 w/ the·7 w/ Office
Alexander Acosta
PERSON18 w/ the·7 w/ Office
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON17 w/ the·7 w/ Office
LJ
Landon Thomas Jr.
PERSON16 w/ the·7 w/ Office
Bill Clinton
PERSON16 w/ the·7 w/ Office
Ken Starr
PERSON17 w/ the·6 w/ Office
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON17 w/ the·5 w/ Office
Alice Fisher
PERSON15 w/ the·6 w/ Office
George W. Bush
PERSON18 w/ the·3 w/ Office
Florida Bar
ORGANIZATION14 w/ the·6 w/ Office
Stephanie Thacker
PERSON14 w/ the·6 w/ Office
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION15 w/ the·4 w/ Office
HE
Herman
PERSON13 w/ the·5 w/ Office
United States
LOCATION15 w/ the·3 w/ Office
SA
Sanchez
PERSON13 w/ the·3 w/ Office
Ocariz
PERSON8 w/ the·7 w/ Office