5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
Entities connected to both the District of Massachusetts and U.S. Investment

United States District Court
ORGANIZATIONthe U.S. Investment Company Act
ORGANIZATION
European Union
ORGANIZATIONInvestment Concentration
ORGANIZATIONiCapital Advisors
ORGANIZATIONGlendower
LOCATIONthe First Circuit
ORGANIZATIONThe Confidential Private Placement Memorandum
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION
Marla Maples
PERSONKeogh
ORGANIZATION
Paul Volcker
PERSONthe District of Columbia
LOCATIONCalder
ORGANIZATIONCayman
LOCATION
Luxembourg
LOCATION
Bulgaria
LOCATION
Ireland
LOCATION