Epstein Secrets

k Court addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra-Johnson Page 25 profits and opportunities or damages based on speculation. [Citation omitted). ... FN15. According to Corpus Juris Secundum, "'Compensatory damages' and 'actual damages' are synonymous terms ... and include( ] all damages other than punitive or exemplary damages." 25 C.J

83860 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

including future contingencies such as lost profits and opportunities or damages based on speculation. [Citation omitted]. ... FN I5. According to Corpus Juris Secundum, " 'Compensatory damages' and 'actual damages' are synonymous terms ... and include' all damages other than punitive or exemplary damages." 25 Da

33509 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

including future contingencies such as lost profits and opportunities or damages based on speculation. [Citation omitted]. ... FN15. According to Corpus Juris Secundum, " 'Compensatory damages' and 'actual damages' are synonymous terms ... and include[ all damages other than punitive or exemplary damages." 25 C.J