Epstein Secrets

07743 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

onstruction is that, unless otherwise defined, words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary common meaning."). United States v. McLymont, 45 F.3d 400, 401 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1077, 115 S.Ct. 5 EFTA00207728 ... "Compensatory damages" are defined as those damages that

13267 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

onstruction is that, unless otherwise defined, words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary common meaning."). United States v. McLymont, 45 F.3d 400, 401 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1077, 115 S.Ct. 5 EFTA00213252 ... "Compensatory damages" are defined as those damages that

33509 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

construction is that, unless otherwise defined, words will besinterpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary common meaning."). United States I McLymont, 45 F.3d 400, 401 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1077, 115 S.Ct. 5 EFTA00233494 ... "Compensatory damages" arc defined as those damages that