4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landgraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute wi
urt, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of appl
that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landoraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become effective on a certain date does not even arguably suggest that it has any application to
ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to triple the amount of the presumptive minimum damages to
t that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. landgraf USI Film Products supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become effective on a certain date does not even arguably suggest that it has any application to
cx post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland'. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas'. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to triple the amount of the presumptive minimum damages to
that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landgraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become EFTA00175359 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2009 Pag
ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to triple the amount of the presumptive minimum damages to a
Entities connected to both USI Film Products and Hendricks

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Hernandez
PERSONWalker
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON