Epstein Secrets

and is most appropriate when the mere making of the charges would prejudice the defendant with the jury. United States v. Reed, 639 F.2d 896, 905 (2d Cir. 1981).' The reason for this discretion is clear: The law protects an individual against multiplicitous indictments to avoid multiple sentences for

t. 2548 (2020) (multiplicity argument waived because the defendant failed to raise the issue by pretrial motion). The government also ignores ample Second Circuit authority that authorizes the relief requested by Ms. Maxwell: The defendant may move to have the prosecution elect among the multiplicitous count

' See also United States v. Ketchum, 320 F.2d 3, 7 (2d Cir.1963); United States v. Carter, 576 F.2d 1061, 1064 (3d Cir.1978); and United States v. Langford, 946 F.2d 798, 802 (11th Cir.1991). 2 See also United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir.1999) (A multiplicitous indictment creates an exa

lse answer is just as 23 EFTA00155930 invidious as an intentionally false answer. United States v. Langford, 990 F.2d 65, 68 (2d Cir. 1993)." As the Second Circuit held in Langford: We read [McDonough] multi-part test as governing not only inadvertent nondisclosures but also nondisclosures or misstatements tha

r. 2018) 47 United States v. Greer, 285 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2002) 36 United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980 (2d Cir. 1968) 29, 38 United States v. Langford, 990 F.2d 65(2d Cir. 1993) 23, 26 United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 304 (2000) 22 United States v. Nelson, 277 F.3d 164 (2d Cir. 2002)

arges in Connecticut federal court that he set up a scheme to bribe Indonesian officials. The British executive's case led to an important ruling by the Second Circuit that said prosecutors can't charge a person with conspiring to violate the FCPA if the individual couldn't be charged with violating the law itself.

for Williamson, then Indiana University basketball player Romeo Langford and another unnamed player from Michigan. Stovall responded with a list: "Langford — 20 Zion — 35 plus [minor] — 15." Debose then sent a text that he was willing to pay the trio "$70,000" and that they should "stay aggressive," the

arges in Connecticut federal court that he set up a scheme to bribe Indonesian officials. The British executive's case led to an important ruling by the Second Circuit that said prosecutors can't charge a person with conspiring to violate the FCPA if the individual couldn't be charged with violating the law itself.

omeo Langford and another unnamed player from Michigan. 2 EFTA00078283 SDNY News Clips, Friday, August 16, 2019 Stovall responded with a list: "Langford — 20 Zion — 35 plus [minor] — 15." Debose then sent a text that he was willing to pay the trio "$70,000" and that they should "stay aggressive," the

ould effectively insulate discoverable acts merely because they were enacted in the presence of an attorney.") (emphasis added). Just a month ago, the Second Circuit addressed this issue when a defendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. -19- EF

"In the absence of a claim of -36- EFTA00179135 privilege, a party usually does not have standing to a subpoena directed to a non-party witness." Langford v. Chyrsler Motors Corp., 513 F.2d 1121, 1126 (2d Cir. 1975). For example, in United States v. Wells, 2006 WL 3203905 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 3, 2006), a p