Epstein Secrets

hat the district court (or Ms. Maxwell or Ms. M) unjustifiably delayed public access to the summary judgment papers. This is incorrect. In Lugosch the Second Circuit was understandably impatient with the district court's delay in acting on two newspapers' motion to intervene to unseal the summary judgment filing

ved in an investigation"; "[t]he district court was in the best position to weigh these factors") (internal quotations and citation omitted); In re N.Y. Times Co., 828 F.2d 110,116 (2d Cir.1987) ("Certainly, the privacy interests of innocent third parties as well as those of defendants that may be harmed by d

years' imprisonment. (Third Comey Decl. (Dkt. No. 59) 1 8; 20 Cr. 330, Judgment (Dkt. No. 696)) On July 7, 2022, Maxwell appealed her conviction to the Second Circuit. (Third Comey Decl. (Dkt. No. 59) 1 9) Maxwell seeks, inter a "a new trial based on alleged juror misconduct and alleged evidentiary issues." (a)

t purposes where the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could decide in the non-movant's favor." Beyer v. County of Nassau, 524 F.3d 160, 163 (2d Cir. 2008). "When no rational jury could find in favor of the nonmoving party because the evidence to support its case is so slight, there is no genuine

is that in FOIA actions, agency affidavits alone will support a grant of summary judgment,' and Local Civil Rule 56.1 statements are not required." N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309, 314 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Ferguson v. FBI 1995 WL 329307, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. 7 EFTA00038658 --- P

ep't of Justice, 312 F.3d 100, 106 (2d Cir. 2002), vacated and remanded, 541 U.S. 970, 124 S.Ct. 1874, 158 L.Ed.2d 464 (2004), aff'd, 380 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (witnesses and third parties "possess strong privacy interests, because being identified as part of a law enforcement investigati

trating that `closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest,' " the documents may be sealed. In re N.Y. Times Co., 828 F.2d 110, 116 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Press-Enterprise Co., 464 U.S. at 510, 104 S.Ct. 819). The compelling interest is the privacy interest di