Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year March 15, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney M, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Reg
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year April 17, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney W , Chief, Criminal Division , MAUSA, Northern
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year January 31, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney er Chief, Criminal Division , MAUSA, Northern Reg
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year April 30, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney M a, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Reg
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p1
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year May I, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08) a ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney M, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Reg
Page: EFTA02857732_p1 →Page EFTA02857732_p7
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). FI2 In 1946, the Supreme Court defin
Page: EFTA02857732_p7 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p1
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year (Revised 9/13/07) ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney M, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Reg
Page: EFTA02857763_p1 →Page EFTA02857763_p7
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). Fl In 1946, the Supreme Court define
Page: EFTA02857763_p7 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p1
Memorandum SubjectDate Re: Operation Leap Year April 23, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney M, I Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern R
Page: EFTA02857810_p1 →Page EFTA02857810_p7
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Page: EFTA02857810_p7 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (146)
Entities connected to both Fifth Circuit and ToFrom
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON41 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
United States
LOCATION30 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Marc Rich
PERSON23 w/ Fifth·6 w/ ToFrom
LB
Leon Black
PERSON19 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Alexander Acosta
PERSON18 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Fifth·4 w/ ToFrom
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON16 w/ Fifth·5 w/ ToFrom
RB
Roy Black
PERSON15 w/ Fifth·6 w/ ToFrom
Bonner v. City of
LOCATION16 w/ Fifth·5 w/ ToFrom
Jacksonville
LOCATION13 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON13 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON13 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Criminal Division
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Fifth·5 w/ ToFrom
Philadelphia
LOCATION10 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Naomi Campbell
PERSON10 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Fifth·2 w/ ToFrom
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON10 w/ Fifth·6 w/ ToFrom
EL
Ellis
PERSON9 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom
Mortensen
PERSON8 w/ Fifth·7 w/ ToFrom