5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
t fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. See M·, DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 ( 1989)( disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing partie
CM/ECF on thislZ day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By I.Jlf,tE ROBERT '.cR.rfTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/84
fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. Sse Lg., DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 (1989Xdisclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing parties t
ied by CM/ECF on this 141 day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Br ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, a 33401 561/842
ee infra. Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of 4 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559
day of June 2010. Respectfully submitted, By: Isl Robert D. Critton, Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 5611842-28
Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials 2 Because of the relief sought in this Rule 4 Appeal, Epstein's civil lawyers have not obtained a cop
DE 555) pursuant to Mag. J. Rule 4, S.D. Fla. for the reasons set out above; f. proper. for such other and s this Court deems just and on a ar MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2010 Page 10 of 11 I HER
Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing par
set out above; f. for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar #224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was being served this day on all counsel of r
Entities connected to both Zolin and Michael J. Pike

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONIsidro Manuel Garcia
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONScott Rothstein
PERSONSpencer Kuvin
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON