Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
By Clear and Convincing Evidence. The People began the SORA hearing by advising the Court that their own investigation and communications with the Florida State 20 EFTA00792368 Attorney's Office that handled Appellant's case revealed that the majority of allegations in the Board's recommendation (and in
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 ('Fr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sch
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
By Clear and Convincing Evidence. The People began the SORA hearing by advising the Court that their own investigation and communications with the Florida State 20 EFTA00181075 I EFTA00181076 Attorney's Office that handled Appellant's case revealed that the majority of allegations in the Board's recom
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 (Tr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
By Clear and Convincing Evidence. The People began the SORA hearing by advising the Court that their own investigation and communications with the Florida State 20 EFTA00231567 Attorney's Office that handled Appellant's case revealed that the majority of allegations in the Board's recommendation (and in
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (fr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 ('It). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
By Clear and Convincing Evidence. The People began the SORA hearing by advising the Court that their own investigation and communications with the Florida State 20 EFTA00232687 Attorney's Office that handled Appellant's case revealed that the majority of allegations in the Board's recommendation (and in
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 (Tr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (202)
Entities connected to both Florida State and the New York Police Department
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON32 w/ Florida·89 w/ the
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Florida·63 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION13 w/ Florida·60 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Florida·58 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON14 w/ Florida·55 w/ the
United States
LOCATION15 w/ Florida·53 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Florida·50 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ Florida·47 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Florida·43 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION14 w/ Florida·39 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON5 w/ Florida·47 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON11 w/ Florida·39 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON8 w/ Florida·35 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON17 w/ Florida·22 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON15 w/ Florida·21 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON12 w/ Florida·21 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON9 w/ Florida·24 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON10 w/ Florida·21 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON5 w/ Florida·25 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Florida·17 w/ the