Epstein Secrets

ore tax information may be obtained by a party in discovery.” Bellosa v. Universal Tile Restoration, Inc., 2008 WL 2620735 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (citing Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Co., 107 F.3d 846 (11th Cir. 1997)); accord U.S. v. Certain Real Property, 444 F.Supp. 2d 1258 (S.D.Fla. 2006); Platypus Wear, I

, 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001), in which the Court applied the higher standard. These cases do not consider the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion in Maddow, and the federal judges in this District over the past five years since Pendlebury have consistently rejected the “compelling need” standard for pro

d that when a plaintiff seeks punitive damages against a defendant, evidence of the defendant’s financial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C. 2004) (holding that tax returns are relevant to the jury’s determination of the amount of punitive

, Inc., 2008 WL 2620735 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (citing Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Co., 107 F.3d 846 (11th Cir.

o not consider the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion in Maddow, and the federal judges in this District over the

nancial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C.

0258 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (citing cases relying upon Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Co., 107 F.3d 846 (11th Cir.

ancial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444 570 (M.D. N.C.