Epstein Secrets

HERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Civil Action No. 10 - 803 09 DOE No. 103, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. FILED bytt)....... FEB 2 3 20W STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK 01ST CT of ft.A. - MIAMI COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, ■ Doe No. 103 ("Plaintiff% brings this Complaint against Defendan

ation sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Useryl. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). FN19. Article 1 contains two Ex Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl

.. M TeNple444 Neraber) GARCIA LAW FIRM, P.A. 224 DATURA STREETM SUITE 900 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 JEFFREY EPSTEIN ANC I KELL Mar. 24, 2009 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S• DIET. GT. 5.0. OF FLA. • MIAMI County of Residence of First Listed Defendant PALM BEACH (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND

tion sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). FN19. Article I contains two Ex Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Civil Action No. 10-80309 JANE DOE No. 103, Plaintiff, I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. FILED byjaD C FEB 2 3 2010 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK IJ S 01ST CT 8. C. of FI.A. - MIAMI COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103 ("Plaintiff'), brings this Complaint ag

cation sufficient to validate a statute's prospective applicagion under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Usery Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). FNI9. Article I contains two Ex Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl