Back to Network
9
Shared Docs
9
Same-Page
9 / 9
Mentions
Document Mentions (9 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendan
s sufficient to assure the defendant's appearance?" Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681432, at *12 (quoting United States v. Vaierio, 9 F. Supp. 3d at 295). HI. The Defendant Provides No Assurance He is Not a Danger to the Community and a Risk to Obstruct Justice A. Danger to the Community In the first instance, the defendant's argument that
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (93)
Entities connected to both Gleeson and The Defendant Provides No Assurance
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON36 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Michael Jackson
PERSON32 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
CA
Casteneda
PERSON32 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Anderson
PERSON32 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
United States
LOCATION31 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Ferranti
PERSON31 w/ Gleeson·9 w/ The
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON31 w/ Gleeson·9 w/ The
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON26 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
AN
Annabi
PERSON26 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Prince Andrew
PERSON26 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION26 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION25 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Reid Weingarten
PERSON25 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
PI
Pitman
PERSON25 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
New York State
LOCATION25 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Harry Reid
PERSON25 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Richard M. Berman
PERSON24 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
LA
Laskow
PERSON24 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The
Amber Southerland
PERSON24 w/ Gleeson·11 w/ The