Epstein Secrets

in a suite prison, with the option of eliminating incarceration upon successful completion of the term of supervised custody. among other terms. Mr. Menchel stated that "the federal interest will not he vindicated in the absence of a Iwo year term in state prison." See August 3.2007 letter. Such an arti

as of traditionally local concern. we urged your Office to contemplate whether a federal prOSCCUtiall Was appropriate. However, on August 3. 2007. Matthew Menchel rejected a proposed state plea which included that Mr. Epstein serve two years of supervised custody followed by two years of incarceration in a su

hat Mr. Epstein's waiver would not stretch past settlement. Ms. Villafana continues to espouse this erroneous interpretation. E. Ms. Villafana ad The Settlement Process. We are concerned that Ms. Villalima has repeatedly attempted to manipulate the process under which Mr. Epstein has agreed to settle civil claims.

a state prison, with the option of eliminating incarceration upon StItA.L55fili completion of the term of supervised custody. among other terms. Mr. Menchel stated that "the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two year term in state prison." Sec August 3. 2007 letter. Such an art

eas of traditionally local concern, we urged your Office to contemplate whether a federal prosecution was appropriate. However, on August 3, 2007. Matthew Menchel rejected a proposed state plea which included that Mr. Epstein serve two years of supervised custody followed by two years of incarceration in a st

!gement from you that Mr. Epstein's waiver would not stretch past settlement. Ms. mimics to espouse this erroneous interprctat ion. F. Ms. and The Settlement Process. We are concerned that Ms. has repeatedly attempted to manipulate the process under which Mr. Epstein has agreed to settle civil claims. First, sh

n to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When you and I could not reach agreement, you repeatedly went over my head, involving Messrs. Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Acosta in the negotiations at various times. In any and all plea negotiations the defendant understands that his options are to plead

o espouse this erroneous interpretation. rstated the scope of Mr. lipstein's waiver of began asserting that Mr. Epstein has waived E. aslIS and The Settlement Process. We are concerned that Ms. Villalitna has repeatedly attempted to manipulate the process under which Mr. E astein has a reed to settle civil claims