Epstein Secrets

21 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 21 personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sideway, 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant'

fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. Sse Lg., DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 (1989Xdisclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing parties t

interests, the individual interests of disclosing personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sidaway, 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2008). The Supreme Court has "consistently held that a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in

ee infra. Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of 4 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559

interests, the individual interests of disclosing personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sidaway, 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). The Supreme Court has "consistently held that a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in i

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials 2 Because of the relief sought in this Rule 4 Appeal, Epstein's civil lawyers have not obtained a cop

e 21 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 21 personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sidaway. 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant'

t fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. See M·, DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 ( 1989)( disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing partie