Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00728574

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ice of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turk

tion to dismiss or for more definite statement of Count II is DENIED. Count IV - Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices Count IV alleges a claim under the Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Fla. Stat. 772.104(1) and (2) ("Florida RICO"). These sections state as follows: (I) Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that h

EFTA01734466

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

tion to dismiss or for more definite statement of Count II is DENIED. Count IV - Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices Count IV alleges a claim under the Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Fla. Stat. 772.104(1) and (2) ("Florida RICO"). These sections state as follows: (1) Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that h

EFTA02725751

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

tion to dismiss or for more definite statement of Count II is DENIED. Count IV - Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices Count IV alleges a claim under the Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Fla. Stat. 772.104(1) and (2) ("Florida RICO"). These sections state as follows: (1) Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that h