Epstein Secrets

for their contention that "[a]dditional in camera submissions should not be allowed on appeal." See Response (DE #525) at 2. Instead, they cite the Ninth Circuit Howell case, which held that a Court has discretion to reject newly offered evidence in an appeal of a magistrate judge's decision. Plaintiffs advan

Appeals for both Jane Doe and Jane Doe Nos. 2 - 8 as well as a reasonable deadline for submitting and filing same. Respectfully submitted, By: s/Michael J. Pike ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service I HEREB

ment clearly has prior knowledge of documents that it gave to Epstein. Here, then – as the magistrate judge properly held relying on an instructive Ninth Circuit opinion (not discussed by Epstein) -- the “existence and location of the documents . . . are a ‘foregone conclusion’ and [Epstein] . . . adds littl

aw.com Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@p

tein)). Congress intended the CVRA to dramatically rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of construing the CVRA generously, the Ninth Circuit observed: "The criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen b

AN, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 401 (561) 842-2820 (561) 515-3148 F By: Robert D. Cri on, Jr. Florida Bar 24162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Ave

tein)). Congress intended the CVRA to dramatically rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of construing the CVRA generously, the Ninth Circuit observed: "The criminal justice system has long flinctioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children — seen b

ne. 2009. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 401 By: Robert D. Cri n, Jr. Florida Bar 24162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 Counsel for Defendant J6ffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Ave

tein)). Congress intended the CVRA to dramatically rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of construing the CVRA generously, the Ninth Circuit observed: "The criminal justice system has long fbnctioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen b

of June, 2009. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 latch, FL 401 By: Robert D. Cri o i Jr. Florida Bar Michael J. Pike Florida Bar 31 Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S