Epstein Secrets

is ca- pacity as District Attorney for San Francisco County, et aL, Defendants- Appellees. Nos. 82-4427, 83-2581. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1984. Decided Sept. 3, 1986. Citizen and organizations promoting voting rights of Americans with ethnic backgrou

arily, one who has not been indicted, arrested, or even threatened with prosecution has no standing to bring a 02007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Full&prft=HTMLE8cfn=_top&mt=... 12/27/2007 EFTA00191794 Page 2 of 3 OS INJUNCTION §

Robert W. Ware, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California, Appel. ken. Mime. Nos. 895, 596. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 5, 1958. Accused, who had been indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for alleged- t mailing cir

a suit for an injunction. 141 Courts 106 €508(7) 106 Courts 106V11 Concurrent and Conflicting Jurisdiction O 2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?vr=2.0&sv=Full&rs=WLW7.11&prft=... 12/27/2007 EFTA00191911 Page 2 of 3 137 F.2d 71 Pag

y Op. Serv. 11,330, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,672 (Cite as: 504 F.3d 737) H U.S. Sinerius C.A.9 (Mont.),2007. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Emil SINERIUS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-30327. Argued and Submitted March 9, 20

made in defendant's pro se filings), that defendant's convictions on counts 2, 3, and 4 must be vacated O 2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?rs=WLW7.11&destination=atp&prft=H... 12/18/2007 EFTA00191987 Page 4 of 13 77 Fed.Appx. 3

take of age jury instruction because it is consti- tutionally mandated. He relies on United States District Court, 858 F.2d at 537-43, in which the Ninth Circuit engrafted a mistake of agc defense in- to the statute after concluding that such a defense was required under the First Amendment although the stat

tatement of the reasons for the detention. FN1. At the conclusion of the May 17, 2007 detention hearing this C 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Full&prft=HTMLE&rs=WLW8.02&... 2/20/2008 EFTA00192194 Page 2 of 2 QUERY - 3142(E) & (

es. *3 While plaintiffs do not cite any case in which a court has held that the doctrine does not apply, the Court's own research reveals that the Ninth Circuit has held that the doctrine of forum non conveniens is inapplicable to Jones Act and FELA cases j because each Act contains a mandato venue provi

nherent authority. IT IS SO ORDERED. Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2006 WL 335237 (N.D.Cal.) END OF DOCUMENT O 2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. Page 2 EFTA00226210 Page 1 of 2 Westiaw. Not Reported in F.Supp.2d Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2006 Wl. 335237 (N.D.Cal.) (Cite as: 20