Epstein Secrets

for production. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36 (2000); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S., 757, 763-764, (1966) ("

th is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protect

tary subpoenas, which is no different from producing documents responsive to a request for production. See U.S. v Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36 (2000); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S., 757, 763-764, (1966) ("the privilege reaches ... the compulsion of responses which are also communications, for example, c

1973) (the person complying with the subpoena "implicitly testifies that the evidence he brings forth is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protected from producing his documents in response to a Subpoena duces tecum, for his production of them i

et 08/31/2009 Page 14 of 18 U.S. 27, 36 (2000); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S., 757, 763-764, (1966) ("t

th is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protect