Epstein Secrets

ts is considered testimonial and is protected by the Fifth Amendment. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2nd Cir. 1993); Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 2000Xthe "privilege" against self-incrimination does not depend upon the likelihood, but upon the possibility of pros

21 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 21 personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sideway, 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant'

s is considered testimonial and is protected by the Fifth Amendment. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2nd Cir. 1993); Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 2000)(the "privilege" against self-incrimination does not depend upon the likelihood, but upon the possibility of pr

interests, the individual interests of disclosing personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sidaway, 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant'

ts is considered testimonial and is protected by the Fifth Amendment. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2nd Cir. 1993); Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 2000)(the "privilege" against self-incrimination does not depend upon the likelihood, but upon the possibility of pro

e 21 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 21 personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sidaway. 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant'

nts is considered testimonial and is protected by the Fifth Amendment. ao in re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2nd Cir. 1993); Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 2000Xthe "privilege" against self-incrimination does not depend upon the likelihood, but upon the possibility of pro

interests, the individual interests of disclosing personal matters and the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions. Favalora v. Sklawav, 966 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant'