4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
rving as the basis for an unfavorable portrayal in a recent Law and Order: Special Victim Episode and a feature story yesterday in the London-based Sunday Mail. We are not asking your Office to join us in our efforts to throw out this unjust agreement. But can't your Office simply stand on the sidelines an
ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
rving as the basis for an unfavorable portrayal in a recent Law and Order: Special Victim Episode and a feature story yesterday in the London-based Sunday Mail. We are not asking your Office to join us in our efforts to throw out this unjust agreement. But can't your Office simply stand on the sidelines an
ur Office prevails on that Issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
rving as the basis for an unfavorable portrayal in a recent Law and Order: Special Victim Episode and a feature story yesterday in the London-based Sunday Mail. We are not asking your Office to join us in our efforts to throw out this unjust agreement. But can't your Office simply stand on the sidelines an
ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
rving as the basis for an unfavorable portrayal in a recent Law and Order: Special Victim Episode and a feature story yesterday in the London-based Sunday Mail. We are not asking your Office to join us in our efforts to throw out this unjust agreement. But can't your Office simply stand on the sidelines an
Entities connected to both the Eleventh Circuit and Sunday Mail

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONJack Goldberger
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION