Epstein Secrets

cations. Kenneth A. Marra From: Paul Cassell To: . (USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS)" , "Brad Edwards r < Date: 07/01/2013 02:21 PM Subject: RE:MTD in the Eleventh Circuit Hi Brad and I are preparing to file today in the Eleventh Circuit a motion to dismiss Epstein's frivolous interlocutory appeal, for reasons outlin

as you can. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101 Salt Lake Ci , UT 84112-0730 (phone) EFTA00209595 (fax You can access my publications on h

c. D.E. 310 at 15-16 citin International Broth. of Teamsters I. AFL-CIO, 32 F.R.D. 441, 442 (E.D.Mich. 1963). Since it is a precedential decision of the Eleventh Circuit, McLellan is binding authority. Accordingly, if the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are applied to petitioners' motion to add Jane Doe No. 3 and J

rn District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, 4.74 Ninrih A tin* c AN / Paul G. Cassell Quinney College of Law at the Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. Imo Attorneys for Intervenor

tations to the victims — and having induced reliance by the victims—the Government is stopped from taking a different position now. As explained by the Eleventh Circuit, to make out a claim of estoppel against the Government, a party must adduce evidence of the following: (I) words, conduct, or acquiescence that in

Submitted, s/ Bradley I. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro MX Vice Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Due 01 and Jane Doe 02 41 EFTA00229957 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 0