the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATIONthe U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
ORGANIZATION4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation Novembe
Page: EFTA00013359 →September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
Page: EFTA00013364 →reasons articulated earlier) grant those remedies as well. 2 References to the "Government" in this case should be generally understood to refer to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL), which is currently being represented by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia. 2 EFTA00021446 --- PAGE BR
Page: EFTA00021446 →. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 332 (1979). Epstein raises no suggestions that he has been denied that opportunity here. Epstein does point to the fact that the Eleventh Circuit has previously ruled in this case that he is not "an ordinary litigant." Jane Doe 1 v. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1005 (11th Cir. 2014). But that
Page: EFTA00021451 →reasons articulated earlier) grant those remedies as well. 2 References to the "Government" in this case should be generally understood to refer to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL), which is currently being represented by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia. 2 EFTA00022550 --- PAGE BR
Page: EFTA00022550 →. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 332 (1979). Epstein raises no suggestions that he has been denied that opportunity here. Epstein does point to the fact that the Eleventh Circuit has previously ruled in this case that he is not "an ordinary litigant." Jane Doe 1 v. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1005 (11th Cir. 2014). But that
Page: EFTA00022555 →D EFTA00023059 --- PAGE BREAK --- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation Novembe
Page: EFTA00023060 →September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
Page: EFTA00023065 →Entities connected to both the Eleventh Circuit and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION
Salt Lake City
LOCATION
Marc Rich
PERSONthe Court of Appeals
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Palm Beach Police Department
ORGANIZATIONWalker
PERSON
Atlanta
LOCATION