Epstein Secrets

t “ ‘special circumstances’ so require in the ‘interests of justice.’ ” United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, 23 F.3d 359, 365 (11th Cir. 1994). In the Eleventh Circuit, the “special circumstances” which may support a stay are limited. The fact that the Defendant may “risk a non-criminal disadvantage by remaining

emaining silent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.”2 Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 540. Accordingly, the Defendant’s right to silence is not a basis to stay the civil case pending resolution of a criminal action.

t “ ‘special circumstances’ so require in the ‘interests of justice.’ ” United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, 23 F.3d 359, 365 (11th Cir. 1994). In the Eleventh Circuit, the “special circumstances” which may support a stay are limited. The fact that the Defendant may “risk a non-criminal disadvantage by remaining

emaining silent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.”2 Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 540. Accordingly, the Defendant’s right to silence is not a basis to stay the civil case pending resolution of a criminal action.

that " `special circumstances' so require in the 'interests of justice.' "United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, 23 F.3d 359, 365 (11th Cir. 1994). In the Eleventh Circuit, the "special circumstances" which may support a stay are limited. The fact that the Defendant may "risk a non-criminal disadvantage by remaining si

e Doe. 'In this regard, The Defendant's silence by invoking the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit adverse inferences against him in the civil case. Shell Oil. 866 F.Supp. at 40. - 3 - EFTA00201248 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 64-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/24/2009 Page 4 of 13 Case 9:08-cv-80381

that " `special circumstances' so require in the `interests of justice.' " United States'. Lot 5. Fox Grove, 23 F.3d 359, 365 (11th Cir. 1994). In the Eleventh Circuit, the "special circumstances" which may support a stay are limited. The fact that the Defendant may "risk a non-criminal disadvantage by remaining si

e Doe. 'In this regard, The Defendant's silence by invoking the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit adverse inferences against him in the civil case. Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 40. - 3 - EFTA00222588 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 4 of 9 defendant's right aga

pen exchange of information to promote significant private and public interests. They are: the decision of Judge Marcus, before he was appointed to the Eleventh Circuit, denying discovery and recognizing a privilege for airline pilots who report incidents and violations, In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F.

aw firms will be sufficiently voluminous to minimize disclosure of the attorney's identification of some occasional wheat among the chaff."); In re Shell Oil, 125 F.R.D. at 134 ("it is highly unlikely that Shell will be able to discern the PLC's `theory of the case' or thought processes simply by knowing