3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citi
s or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead,
might incriminate him Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 480 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2010 Page 2 of 10 - 3 in future criminal proceedings.” Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded “liberal construction i
the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead, the privilege must be asserted in response to a particular question, and in each instance the burden
incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citi
s or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead,
Entities connected to both Edwin and Sprague

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONHubbell
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONApfelbaum
PERSONTurley
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONGoodwin
PERSONAnglada
PERSONMorganroth
PERSONGlanzer
PERSON
Rudy Giuliani
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON