Epstein Secrets

nary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendme

LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable

17)). “The claimant must be ‘confronted by substantial and ‘real,’ and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce do

ONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, in West Palm Beach Florida, this 4th day of March, 2010. LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Hon. Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 480 Entered on FLSD Docket

nary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendme

LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable

nary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Docum

LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable

23240 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 6 of 22 or imaginary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce

tein, Case No. 08- CIV-80119 MARRA/JOHNSON, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, United States Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson found, "pin 2008, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney General's Office for the Federal Southern Distri