Epstein Secrets

o “direct or indirect contact” with the Plaintiffs. (D.E. 238). 8. The July 31, 2009 Order mirrored the June 30, 2008 criminal sentence entered by Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillio, wherein she instructed Jeffrey Epstein that he shall have “no direct or indirect contact” with the Plaintiffs. (D.E. 23

rowitz Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 5 of 6 6 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley

icial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. He was sentenced to 18 months in jail. 3. In the course of the plea/sentencing colloquy, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillio explicitly instructed Defendant as follows: Court: Okay. [Item] D is, you shall not have any contact with the victim,

of Electronic Filing. s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual

ndant Epstein in their pending 3 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 3 of 7 actions. In June 2008, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Pucillo ordered Defendant Epstein “not to have any contact, direct or indirect,” with any of his victims. Judge Pucillo clarified that forbi

tz . 6 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 6 of 7 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley

. In the course of the plea/sentencing colloquy, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillio explicitly instructe

SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldbe

added). Epstein's intimidation-by-surrogate also violates a no-contact order entered during the course of his guilty pleas on June 30, 2008, before Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo, who ordered Epstein "not to have any contact, direct or 2 EFTA00728794 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAMOHNSON indirect"

d Notices of Electronic Filin. Bradley J. Edwards 16 EFTA00728808 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAIJOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er, Es . Isidro Manual Garcia Mi h I m Paul G. Cassell 17 EFTA00728809 UNITED STATES DISTRIC

tein in their pending 3 EFTA00222249 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 06)08:2009 Page 4 of 7 actions. In June 2008, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Pucillo ordered Defendant Epstein "not to have any contact, direct or indirect," with any of his victims. Judge Pucillo clarified that forbid

owitz 6 EFTA00222252 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 06)08.2009 Page 7 of 7 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edward

2005. Plea bargain The appellate case stems from a decision by federal prosecutors not to charge Epstein if he pleaded guilty to state charges in Palm Beach Circuit Court for soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. He was sentenced to 18 months in jail and house arrest. Epstein moved back to New York City from

al or in pleadings, the Intervenors need not even demonstrate "good cause" in order to obtain relief. As the Hon. Karon Owen Bowdre, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama recently held: '(...continued) LEXIS 66742, at "9-11 (finding settlement communications non-discoverable as "