Epstein Secrets

p-p:.i.,~.:.., 2010. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Str

stitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2

l counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of , 2010. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldbe

07743 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

l counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of , 2010. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] kezell@p

13267 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

of right by a jury. Date: C44.ArtatA4-1.2)-3 , 2010. Respectfully Submitted, By: iRreat fia—Plef'-b W4P/ Robert C. Jose erg Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Fax: (305) 358-2382 rjosefs

94814 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

triable as of right by a jury. Date: 4artitA4-1-i-3 , 2010. Respectfully Submitted, By: ke-PO4 fe-Peet-vbv Robert (.Jose erg Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Fax: (305) 358-2382 sefsber

83860 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

ll issues triable as of right by a jury. Date: ‘44..Art.AA-r-12)-3 , 2010. Respectfully Submitted, By: R-W- C. e-pecli lay Robert r Jose e g Katherine W. Ezell Attorneys or Plaintiff Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 17 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800„ Miami, FL 33130, Miami 31:6393.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lau

33509 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by