Epstein Secrets

EFTA00230254 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 7 OF 7 The letter's assertions regarding representation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge Davis conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingness to undertake this assi

d that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. Davis should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, et at 10 During this same time frame, Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz sought to delay the entry of his

is should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, et at 10 During this same time frame, Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz sought to delay the entry of his guilty plea and sentence. After the SDFL accomm

d happen if a victim refused to accept the minimum settlement you offered to her does not render the Agreement void, unconscionable, or violative of Due Process. Whether counsel for the victims decides that there is a conflict is something to be addressed by him, but the Agreement speaks for itself. Finall

ession that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. The letter's assertions regarding representation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge Davis conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingness to undertake this assi

d happen if a victim refused to accept the minimum settlement you offered to her does not render the Agreement void, unconscionable, or violative of Due Process. Whether counsel for the victims decides that there is a conflict is something to be addressed by him, but the Agreement speaks for itself. Finally

ession that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. The letter's assertions regarding representation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge Davis conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingness to undertake this assi

d happen if a victim refused to accept the minimum settlement you offered to her does not render the Agreement void, unconscionable, or violative of Due Process. Whether counsel for the victims decides that there is a conflict is something to be addressed by him, but the Agreement speaks for itself. Finally

pression that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. The letter's assertions regarding remagntation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingness to undertake this assignmen

d happen if a victim refused to accept the minimum settlement you offered to her does not render the Agreement void, unconscionable, or violative of Due Process. Whether counsel for the victims decides that there is a conflict is something to be addressed by him, but the Agreement speaks for itself. Finall

ression that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. The letter's assertions regarding re esentation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingness to undertake this assignmen

d happen if a victim refused to accept the minimum settlement you offered to her does not render the Agreement void, unconscionable, or violative of Due Process. Whether counsel for the victims decides that there is a conflict is something to be addressed by him, but the Agreement speaks for itself. Finally

not include any language that demeans the harm they may have suffered. The letter's assertions regarding representation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate. Judge conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingness to undertake this assignment prior to finalizing hi

d happen if a victim refused to accept the minimum settlement you offered to her does not render the Agreement void, unconscionable, or violative of Due Process. Whether counsel for the victims decides that there is a conflict is something to be addressed by him, but the Agreement speaks for itself. Finall