Epstein Secrets

05/29/2009 122 MOTION for Hearing MOTION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING by Jane Doe No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Josefsberg, Robert) (Entered: 05/29/2009) 06/01/2009 Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: Calendar Call set for 5/28/2010 10:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division b

ng in part and denying in part 129 Motion to Reschedule Hearing. The hearing will not be reset. However, Robert Josefsberg may r tel honically. Mr. Josefsberg shall contact the courtroom deputy at chambers at least 24 hours prior to the hearing.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 06/01/09. (1c3) (Entere

he witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger' of criminal liability. Hoffman'. United States, 341 U.S. 479,486 (1951). 7 This could give the LISAO a tremendous advantage in prosecuting Epstein in the Federal Criminal Action. See Comment, Using Equitable Powers to Coordinate Parallel Civil and C

ond settlement and include litigating claims for individuals. In Ms. Villalima's Victims Notification letter, she states that Mr. I'odhurst and Mr. Josefsberg. the selected attorney representatives, may -represent- the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected representatives will agr

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2255 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when. after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement, we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of tt restitution fu

the validity of any such claim under this statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsberg (though we hope

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2255 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when, after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of I restitution fun

'sduties go beyond settlement and include litigating claims for individuals. In Victims Notification lever, she states that Mr. limilturst and Mr. Josefsberg. the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This tango a •a • • at the selected representatives will agre

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2235 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when. after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of restitution fund: