Epstein Secrets

vised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transm

emain confidential," Document 29 at 2. Further, you deemed the NPA "confidential," for understandable purposes, in your September 3, 2008 letter to Robert Josefsberg in which you informed him that Judge Marra had set forth procedures for providing the NPA only to those counsel and "victims" who executed a Protec

costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstan

ised this continued to escalate during two years. The routine became familiar to Epstein's assistant would telephone her every time Epstein was in the Town of Palm Beach and would place appointments for her to visit and work for Epstein. Each time something new was introduced, additional monies were produced and off

Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: September 15, 2008 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Robert Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. City National Bank Building 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Re: Representation of Victims of Jeff

k, P.A. City National Bank Building 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Re: Representation of Victims of Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Josefsberg: As per our conversation, I have enclosed the following: 1. additional victim notification letters; 2. an updated confidential victim notificati

n. This was done to y additional victims or witnesses. The analysis revealed that• had called the victim/witnesses frequently when Epstein was in the Town of Palm Beach to "work." This confirms what the girls interviewed had previously stated. would notify them when Epstein was in town and their willingness to "wo

o it was easy 24 for me to say contact the FBI because we have nothing 25 here. 150 1 Q. And Mr. Garcia? 2 A. No. 3 Q. And anyone from Mr. Josefsberg or anybody fro 4 his law firm? 5 A. No. 6 Q. How about investigators, did you know a man 7 nano listen? 8 A. No. 9. Q. Fandrey? 10 A. N

sh your memory about the going 5 TIM WITNESS: Are you limiting your 5 ton.? 6 questioning to just the persons that lived within 6 A. Yes. 7 the Town of Palm Beach limits? 7 Q. And during what period of time would they have 8 BY MR. WEIN13ERO: • a these trash pulls? 9 Q. Let me start with the people wit

11 12 13 14 15 16 -17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. Page 345 and/or witness in a police investigation involving a gentleman that lives in the Town of Palm Beach. Q. And had you, at the time of say by October of 2005, within 30 days of your commencing of your responsibilities in this investigation, conclude

nsel Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Finn, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 08-80469 in elated Case No. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases

m each Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach. FL 33480 Tel: 20. Subject matter: Investigator. 21. supervisor Sat igatBureau of the Town of Palm Beach 3101 N.W. 16th Terrace Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Tel: (877) 46-WASTE Subject matter: The incident which is the subject matter of this lawsuit. Di