Epstein Secrets

costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstan

B-Mail: RBlack@Royalackcom Thank you for your letter of February 11, 2010. We write to update you about ongoing efforts to reach an agreement with Robert Josefsberg regarding the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil

vised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transm

an enterprise); unlawfully conducted or participated, directly or indirectly, in such an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering, § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat., as alleged above herein. 64. The breadth and scope of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and, potentially, L.M.'s racketeering activity continues to be investigat

[email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] William J. Berger

er example, many of the questions raise issues with regard to whether to waive various privileges for doctor-patient information and records (e.g., Fla. Stat. Ann. § 456.057), and various privileges for psychotherapist-patient information and records (e.g., Fla. Stat. Ann. § 90.503) and attorney-client pr

Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz ah

of “rendition of legal services to the client.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 90.502(2). Documents given by the govern